Villadelprat: "McLaren's Honda decision hasty"

  • Published on 05 Mar 2018 09:49
  • comments 20
  • By: Rob Veenstra

Former F1 engineer Joan Villadelprat wonders if McLaren was right to have dumped Honda. Already last week, when Honda's new works partner Toro Rosso topped the mileage charts in Barcelona, driver Brendon Hartley said McLaren's decision may have been a "mistake".

And now, Spanish former F1 engineer Villadelprat also doubts the wisdom of McLaren's Honda axe. "I already had reservations last year and I still do," he told Marca. "I thought it was a hasty change and that they would miss all the advantages. As a customer you always have limitations, especially it seems when you are with Renault. I think French pride will drive them to very much want to beat them (McLaren)," said Villadelprat, who worked for McLaren, Ferrari, Benetton and Prost.

He continued: "I think the McLaren is a very developed car aerodynamically, but as the year progresses, Renault will move ahead. They are not investing all of that money from Paris without their own ambitions."

Villadelprat said all McLaren and Fernando Alonso can realistically hope for, therefore, is fourth place behind F1's existing top three teams. "I do not doubt that Fernando will do podiums, but further than that I think will be very difficult," he added.

And he thinks that with a more reliable and powerful Honda engine, Toro Rosso could be a surprise of 2018. "I do not rule out that they will be together with Renault and McLaren. I know very well that they fit perfectly with Honda and they want the project to work, as does Red Bull. I'm sure they (Red Bull) will take that engine in 2019 and will help in every way to develop it. Honda's potential is enormous if someone helps them to channel it," Villadelprat added. (GMM)

It is too early, but thats media for you. But if you think this is hating, lord knows you should stay away from the toxic wastes of 9Gag and the saltmines of League of Legends. Those places are dark and full or terrors. No, this isnt hate, but its the usual media speculations along with lots of p... [Read more]

  • 1
  • Mar 5 2018 - 18:13

Replies (20)

Login to reply
  • Major Tom

    Posts: 152

    On the other hand if McLaren hadn't dumped Honda would Honda have made the sweeping change they have to the management of the project?

    • + 0
    • Mar 5 2018 - 10:18
    • Maybe, maybe not. Its hard to tell. But remember that Honda already made huge reorganizations mid-partnership, when Arai was replaced with Hasegawa, who then proceeded with massrecruiting to the Sakura base.

      • + 0
      • Mar 5 2018 - 16:27
    • Bhurt

      Posts: 320

      There are of course suggestions that McLaren placed a lot of restrictions on Honda that contributed greatly to the problems they had. And the McLaren gearbox was reportedly the source of all the vibrations (which explains why Honda saw no vibrations on their dyno).

      • + 0
      • Mar 6 2018 - 19:11
    • You can see lots of things in car that you wont see on the dyno. But Im sure McLaren wasnt innocent. At least not during 2015.

      • + 0
      • Mar 6 2018 - 20:06
  • Kean

    Posts: 692

    Woulda, coulda, shoulda. 20-20 hind sight is a beautiful thing. Besides, we really don't know anything from the tests regarding the power or fuel consumption of the Honda PU. Further, I believe it was a decision based more so on the working relationship between McLaren and Honda and not just on doubts about the quality of the Honda PU. Vandoorne has said that already he's become closer and talked more to the Renault people than he ever did with the Honda people. Since McLaren wasn't gonna get a supply from Mercedes, let alone Ferrari, this became their only option. And they've been telling themselves it was the right thing to do and using Red Bull as an example that you can win with customer engines. All this does really is highlight the need for Liberty and the FIA to do something about the current engine regs, we can't have two huge teams (McLaren & Red Bull) out of contention for the title.

    • + 0
    • Mar 5 2018 - 11:06
    • If Wolff is to be trusted (and mostly that seems to be the case... as far as you can trust a businessman), Mercedes did offer McLaren a deal for 2018, but McLaren dragged on time, and the deal was off. So McLaren pretty much shot themselves in the foot.

      • + 0
      • Mar 5 2018 - 16:33
    • Kean

      Posts: 692

      I honestly believe that was a load of crap from Wolff.

      • + 0
      • Mar 5 2018 - 18:14
    • Yes, I don't believe that for a second. Toto and Laura were pretty clear about it several times. There was no interest whatsoever. Even more unbelievable is to think that McLaren would have dragged their feet to get a Mercedes engine

      • + 0
      • Mar 6 2018 - 19:15
    • Well, I trust Laura as far as I can throw her, and that aint far (I mean Im skinny as fudge, I aint throwing anything anywhere). And I have a hard time trusting that in general. But it wouldnt surprise me if it was true. I mean it would be such a McLaren thing to do, do get a proposal from Mercedes only to waste the chance.

      • + 0
      • Mar 6 2018 - 20:05
  • boudy

    Posts: 1,168

    It's a bit early for Villadelprat to be saying this. What I would say is that I believe that Redbull lucked into the current situation since they now have the opportunity to choose between 2 power-plants something that's a bit of a rarity these days.

    The engine supply chain is going to change of the next seasons and the lack of supply by mercedes/Ferrari to the likes of mcLaren/Redbull might cause them issues in the long run.

    • + 0
    • Mar 5 2018 - 11:18
    • We need more independent engine suppliers to F1. The likes of Mercedes and Ferrari have too much power now, they can pretty much govern whom they want to give more power. Heck, even Renault have a certain degree of that power. Intentional or not, them not providing TR with enough spares at the end of last year did limit how hard TR could push. F1 cant thrive with suppliers being able to excert that kind of power.

      • + 0
      • Mar 5 2018 - 16:35
  • reg

    Posts: 162

    Well Melbourne will start to show how right or wrong McLaren were! My gut feeling is that they will seriously upset the status quo at the front of the grid.
    The fact that they chose to test in Barca with the ultra soft and the times they got show their Achilles heel of tyre temperature may well have been worked on very heavily at Barca and that they have at long last solved it or at least understand it much more. This all bodes well for this season, hopefully the oil injection/burning dodge is going to be policed and Merc will not have the ability to have that super extra power for quali laps as they have had for the last few years.
    Roll on Melbourne I cannot wait!

    • + 0
    • Mar 5 2018 - 14:41
  • We will see soon enough. I agree with the general consensus, its far too early. TBH, I dont think McLaren and Honda were good for each other, and hopefully their divorce will lead to better results for them both.

    • + 0
    • Mar 5 2018 - 16:24
  • Honda deserve to be dumped here. Three years is a very very long time for a top team like McLaren. It simply destroyed their brand value. If Honda had better plans, they could have discussed with McLaren before the split.

    • + 0
    • Mar 5 2018 - 16:47
  • Oh please... here we go. Honda had a solid showing in the first test and now McLaren made a huge mistake. It's F1's new pastime, hating on McLaren. The truth is that Honda had 3 years to provide something at least half decent. They didn't. The relationship wasn't sustainable. Every proper business plan needs an exit strategy. Three years of dreadful reliability and performance triggered an exit. McLaren will be (is) better off for it, and so is Honda. Not that that will stop people from finding ways to keep blaming McLaren for Honda's dreadful PUs.

    • + 0
    • Mar 5 2018 - 18:04
    • It is too early, but thats media for you. But if you think this is hating, lord knows you should stay away from the toxic wastes of 9Gag and the saltmines of League of Legends. Those places are dark and full or terrors. No, this isnt hate, but its the usual media speculations along with lots of people tired of McLaren's constant talking but very little walking. Contrary to what many say, I actually find the criticism McLaren now get necessary. If you overpromise, thats the sorta treatment you will get.

      • + 1
      • Mar 5 2018 - 18:13
    • @calle I was referring to Villadelprat's comments. As far as I remember you are a McLaren fan. Albeit a very disappointed and angry one (aren't we all at this point). I just get incensed by someone drawing definitive conclusions from a test that was anything but conclusive. Between cold weather, tyre differentials I think the only definitive (and obvious) conclusion was that Mercedes has a very good car again. Can't wait for this week though, should be MUCH more interesting and representative.

      • + 0
      • Mar 5 2018 - 19:52
    • I am indeed a very disappointed McLaren fan. Im not sure how much more representative this week will be, but we will certainly get more material to draw further potentially unrealistic conclusions. Testing in general is a very poor reference for where things will be. But as you say, its safe to say that Mercedes will be able to shout UNLIMITED POWAAAH (!!!) again this year.

      • + 0
      • Mar 5 2018 - 19:58
    • Kean

      Posts: 692

      Fellas, let's show a little optimism here. You say it's only testing and no conclusions can be drawn, yet I sense an undertone stating that McLaren will not fight with the big boys. But what if conclusions can be drawn from this test (kindly disregard all your logical come backs now, remember optimism). I say McLaren will mix it up with the top three this year, and we'll have a top four. Ferrari, Red Bull and McLaren will win races and make it Mercedes most difficult season since the start of the new PU era.

      • + 0
      • Mar 5 2018 - 20:52
  • can't wait to see him eat his own words.

    • + 0
    • Mar 5 2018 - 18:31

BE Grand Prix of Belgium

Local time 

BEGrand Prix of Belgium

Local time 

World Championship standings 2024

Show full world champion standings

Test calendar

See full test schedule

Related news

Give your opinion!

Will Bottas challenge Hamilton for the world championship in 2020?

Formula 1 Calendar - 2024

Date
Grand Prix
Circuit
-
Bahrain
29 - Mar 2
Bahrain
7 - Mar 9
Saudi Arabia
22 - Mar 24
Australia
5 - Apr 7
Japan
19 - Apr 21
China
3 - May 5
United States of America
17 - May 19
Italy
24 - May 26
Monaco
7 - Jun 9
Canada
21 - Jun 23
Spain
28 - Jun 30
Austria
5 - Jul 7
United Kingdom
19 - Jul 21
Hungary
26 - Jul 28
Belgium
23 - Aug 25
Netherlands
30 - Sep 1
Italy
13 - Sep 15
Azerbaijan
20 - Sep 22
Singapore
18 - Oct 20
United States of America
25 - Oct 27
Mexico
1 - Nov 3
Brazil
22 - Nov 24
United States of America
29 - Dec 1
Qatar
6 - Dec 8
United Arab Emirates
See full schedule

Formula 1 Calendar - 2024

Date
Grand Prix & Circuit
29 - Mar 2
7 - Mar 9
Saudi Arabia Jeddah Street Circuit
22 - Mar 24
Australia Albert Park
5 - Apr 7
19 - Apr 21
3 - May 5
United States of America Miami International Autodrome
17 - May 19
24 - May 26
Monaco Monte Carlo
7 - Jun 9
21 - Jun 23
28 - Jun 30
Austria Red Bull Ring
5 - Jul 7
United Kingdom Silverstone
19 - Jul 21
Hungary Hungaroring
26 - Jul 28
23 - Aug 25
Netherlands Circuit Zandvoort
30 - Sep 1
Italy Monza
13 - Sep 15
Azerbaijan Baku City Circuit
20 - Sep 22
18 - Oct 20
United States of America Circuit of the Americas
25 - Oct 27
1 - Nov 3
Brazil Interlagos
22 - Nov 24
United States of America Las Vegas Street Circuit
29 - Dec 1
6 - Dec 8
United Arab Emirates Yas Marina Circuit
See full schedule

Driver profile

  • Team Aston Martin
  • Points 518
  • Podiums 9
  • Grand Prix 147
  • Country ES
  • Date of b. Jul 29 1981 (42)
  • Place of b. Oviedo, ES
  • Weight 68 kg
  • Length 1.71 m
Show full profile

Team profile

Show full profile
show sidebar